Support science across the country by writing opinion pieces in local papers.
Science is stitched into the fabric of every town, including mine and yours. Our goal is to encourage scientists to return to their hometowns by writing brief opinion pieces in their hometown newspaper, advocating for investment in American science, especially the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF).
American Science makes jobs, creates new medical treatments, invent new technologies, supports new businesses, and advances the nation’s prosperity. Science is worth investing in.
Our country’s progress in science begins in every community, with anyone who’s willing to wonder, question, and search for answers.
The articles you can write are reminders that our science comes from every town, belongs to everyone in the country, and is critical to our nation’s success. Local newspapers have a circulation of around 15 million people (1.5x the circulation of the New York Times and 6x the Washington Post) and target a more diverse cross-section of communities and demographics than large urban papers.
Jessica Cantlon and Steve Piantadosi are both NIH and NSF funded scientists, friends and collaborators, who believe that tenured faculty, with secure jobs and the freedom to speak out, have an obligation to spread the word about the importance of these instutitions.
If you are interested in helping, please find a newspaper in a county you know (see the map at the bottom of the page), preferably where you grew up. Contact editors about placing an opinion piece on the importance of NIH and NSF funding to the region. You can often find the editor’s contact information on the paper webpage.
It often is helpful in contacting editors to (1) make a local connection, (2) highlight the recent/newsworthy aspects of what’s happening recently, and (3) argue that you have a strong, original perspective which isn’t otherwise being shared.
We have provided examples of emails for contacting editors.
The editor can tell you what parameters for length, timing, and content are most appropriate. Then, work with them (and us, if we can help) to write a compelling argument for supporting American science.
Please be sure that after you have written a piece, send it to us so we can share it on this page.
Here are some suggestions for content:
We are lucky to have a number of volunteer editors who are happy to read drafts of your opinion pieces and make suggestions:
Since we are primarily advocating support for NIH/NSF, we especially encourage faculty at universities, who have received funding from these institutions and can articulate their importance.
There are online tools showing the economic benefit of NIH and economic benefit of NSF in each state (state NSF funding can be found here). Here is an NIH page about direct economic impacts. In addition, the CDC has a site with data on leading causes of death for each state. We recommend tuning the arguments and data used to the argument and audience.
Generally, we recommend emphasizing the local, community impact of research conducted by NIH and NSF, including medical treatments and basic understanding needed for future applications. We think it is important to emphasize that unlike paying a business, funding for research contributes to a greater common good, and committing to sharing/disseminating the work is often a key piece of receiving funding.
Yes, here and here and here are example opinion pieces. Each takes a somewhat different angle, but focuses on similar core points. Feel free to use them for inspiration for your own.
Our project is not focused on arguing for or against any particular political party or politician. Support for NIH and NSF has always been bipartisan, and our goal is to spread the message about why science is important to the American public in order to foster a broad base of support.
It will depend on the paper and what the editor says, but most will be 500-1000 words.
Yes, but note that many venues will not want to publish identical text to somewhere else. You also should not send the same article to many venues at the same time.
Try to find a new one. You may have to try several papers before you get a response from editors.
Yes. However, our goal is to encourage outreach beyond major cities and university towns, so please consider that when you are thinking of venues.
No.
If you have experience with journalism, science outreach, web development, or geospatial data tools, and are interested in helping, please contact Jessica & Steve.
Here are additional resources that are helpful:
5calls helps people contact congressional representatives. They have set up a page for NIH and NSF funding cuts specifically.
The American Association of University Professors has been a valuable resource in defending education.
Other outreach venues like Skype a scientist help scientists connect with communities.
The Union of Concerned Scientists is organizing outreach efforts to support NIH and NSF, including a letter on Science for the Public Good.